A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, search for to develop their relatives household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic of your depth from the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply just seeking to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet Rene Collier site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays unsure. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should Reside together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how promptly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.