A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among possible neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining manufactured by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their scheduling authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries of their site, bringing about an encroachment over a Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as such areas are issue to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological penalties, specially within a delicate coastal setting including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, that is partly constructed, is in the right position. Their authorized team has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal organizing disputes, where views of The ocean are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced in the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which has due to the fact turn out to be emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being meant to gather visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as readers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal timeline.
On the core with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is determined by issue for environmental safety and adherence to Paul Feely and René Collier preparing regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few merely endeavoring to establish a family home in accordance with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that all will work have been performed based on Skilled information and authorised designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for the circumstance that a lot of observers see as increasingly common. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waistline-substantial water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily truth of the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an abnormal method.
Given that the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up conditions. But the human factor stays central: neighbours who ought to Are living together with one another long after the lawful costs are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the situation prolong outside of that tackle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. It also underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when basic concerns like environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will eventually finally be altered, removed, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most intently watched setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.